East agile logo ruby red v003_50

Scrappy Hosting for OS X

Posted by Lawrence Sinclair on 17 Apr 2010 at 11:15

I rather like the idea of co-location for mac minis. It seems like a really cost-effective choice for a lot of applications. Essentially, if you want a lot of memory, and disk and cpu, and don't need vast bandwidth, then Mac Mini co-location could be a really low cost option.

Good applications for this sort of hosting would be departmental applications, websites like eastagile.com, or even advanced analytic and data applications that are stable in terms of size. We do not use Mac Mini hosting, but the idea is intriguing for such applications.


 

Mac Mini Co-location
 
Consider what you could put at macminicolo.net for $70/month:
 
A mac mini server
  • 8 GB of RAM
  • 2 x 500 GB Hard drives (1 TB)
  • 2.53 Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo
Lots of external hard drive space for backups and files to serve
  • 1 TB USB Hard Drive
(plus, I bet for less than $200/month you could convince them to host an $800 Promise SmartStor DS4600 for 4TB of external firewire 800 RAID).
 
The hardware costs about $1,650 (mini + 1 TB external drive) and they will set it up for you. Add the $840 in annual hosting costs, and $2,490 or so will cover hardware purchase and hosting for a year. The real cost is lower since you can probably expect to get more than a year of use out of the server. One might argue that these Macs are not the most reliable machines on the market, or other options are more dependable. But at these prices, it might make sense if you can consider purchasing more redundant machines than you could otherwise. If you want redundancy, you could host at two different mac mini hosting facilities, such as xservhosting and macminicolo.
 
Bandwidth included is 200GB/month and $1.75GB beyond that. 
 
I haven't asked exactly how it would work, but it seems to me that a special benefit of mac mini hosting is that one can just easily have the server put in a FedEx package and mailed to you. It is small enough that this seems easy to manage.

Remember, of course, that you need to handle the infrastructure and all that stuff yourself. That can be a big deal, or not.
 
Now lets compare this to other hosting options.
 
Joyent
 
These guys are good. We have used them for years and host eastagile.com on them. But they are so expensive we are careful to use only barely adequately powered machines. It is almost like mainframe days again.
 
8 GB Joyent virtual machine with 2 cpu cores (burstable to 7 cores) and 100 GB of storage. $1,000/month, $12,000/year.
1TB of storage costs $1,500/year. This is NAS (network storage) which is slow, but presumably highly redundant.
 
 
$0.15/GB for extra bandwidth after first 10 TB. Note that is is immensely cheaper, and more, than the mac mini colocation providers.

 

Superior Voice Quality

Posted by Lawrence Sinclair on 31 Jan 2010 at 17:38

Polycom 335 HD Voice SIP VOIP PhoneIf you would like your calls to have absolutely the best sound possible, you should use a SIP provider like onsip.com (we use them) then use HD voice phones from Polycom (the HDTV of phones such as the Polycom 335, $115or Polycom 550). HD Voice is starting to come out from other manufacturers and is supported by many SIP gateways. The difference between a conversation between two HD Voice phones versus two regular phones is similar to the difference between talking in person versus talking on the phone. Onsip.com provides the following comparison:

To give you an idea of what the difference is, this is what an HD call with a Polycom 650 sounds like, and this is what the standard phone call sounds like.

If you would like the best sound possible from Skype, you can use the following: a Blue microphone, stand and shockmount and to eliminate "pop" a shield.  This is unapologetic uncompromising overkill. 

Blue USB Microphone Setup

 


 

 

Copyright 2010 The Stanyan Group